<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Everyone Doping?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cycling.clintgc.com/is-everyone-doping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cycling.clintgc.com/is-everyone-doping/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Clint Gordon-Carroll]]></title>
		<link>http://cycling.clintgc.com/is-everyone-doping/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clint Gordon-Carroll]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cycling.clintgc.com/?p=34#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Luc,

Thanks for the response. I agree w/ your point of view. I struggle to see how the UCI is helping pro cyclists by signing such a document. UCI should be spending more effort protecting cyclists from false claims.  The cheaters will be weeded out; allowing WADA to run un-checked is hurting the sport more!

Clint</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luc,</p>
<p>Thanks for the response. I agree w/ your point of view. I struggle to see how the UCI is helping pro cyclists by signing such a document. UCI should be spending more effort protecting cyclists from false claims.  The cheaters will be weeded out; allowing WADA to run un-checked is hurting the sport more!</p>
<p>Clint</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Luc]]></title>
		<link>http://cycling.clintgc.com/is-everyone-doping/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cycling.clintgc.com/?p=34#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Not everyone is doping and if you believe the UCI pledge then no one is doping as all 189 cyclists signed to say they were and are clean.  Although i was against the cyclists signing such a document i now look at is as a positive step in validating Landis' claim that he was clean and not doping.  Many if not most of these cyclists were there last year when FL won and if they were all clean last year then why in the world would FL be any different then the rest?  If you want more balanced views read TBV's and Rant's Blogs.  They are biased towards FL but provide clear and thoroughly researched info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone is doping and if you believe the UCI pledge then no one is doping as all 189 cyclists signed to say they were and are clean.  Although i was against the cyclists signing such a document i now look at is as a positive step in validating Landis&#8217; claim that he was clean and not doping.  Many if not most of these cyclists were there last year when FL won and if they were all clean last year then why in the world would FL be any different then the rest?  If you want more balanced views read TBV&#8217;s and Rant&#8217;s Blogs.  They are biased towards FL but provide clear and thoroughly researched info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

